Government and multilaterals

Use cases

The five advantages for a government, each with its illustrative example.

The four steps, in one example

  1. Authorization

    Illustrative example

    A head of service authorizes an agent to process the applications for a subsidy.

  2. Agent act

    Illustrative example

    The agent decides an application for the subsidy, and the act stays tied to the head of service who authorized it. In 2027 refusal of acts outside authority arrives: a decision above the delegated amount will not go through.

  3. Signed record

    Illustrative example

    Each decision is signed with the person who authorized the agent and the moment of the act.

  4. Verification

    Illustrative example

    With the evidence package, the comptroller’s office verifies on its own machine the subsidy decisions in which the agent took part.

Dates are projections of the current development plan, not commitments.

Five advantages for a government

Each advantage answers a question that a comptroller’s office, a supervisor or a citizen will ask sooner or later.

The examples are typical cases in public administration, not customers or deployments.

  1. Who answers for each act?

    • Today

      Every act of an agent sits under the authorization of an identified person, and that authorization is revoked with immediate effect.

    • 2027

      Refusal of acts that exceed the delegated authority: amounts, subject matters and terms.

    Illustrative example

    An agent decides a subsidy under a public official’s authorization. When the official changes, their authorization is revoked and the record shows the date. In 2027, with refusal of acts outside authority, the agent will not be able to approve above the delegated amount.

  2. Does the proof depend on the provider?

    • Today

      Every record is signed and stays in the public body’s own cloud account, not in the provider’s.

    • 2027 service · 2028 product

      A verifiable evidence package: the signed records are exported and verified on any machine, without access to Unica and without trusting the public body or Teipsum.

    Illustrative example

    A comptroller’s office asks for the file of a tender in which an agent took part. With the evidence package, it receives a verifiable file, not screenshots or access to the system.

  3. What did the system see that day?

    • Today

      The signed record shows who acted, under whose authorization, and when.

    • From 2028

      Rebuilding what the system saw at a given moment (the data and the rules in force, and who or what touched each piece of data) and explaining it to the people affected.

    Illustrative example

    A citizen complains about a decision from eight months ago. From 2028, the data and the rules in force that day are rebuilt, not today’s.

  4. How is each guideline shown to be met?

    • 2027 service · 2028 product

      With the verifiable evidence package, traceability, human oversight, explanation and residency are laid out as controls, by legal obligation, article by article.

    Illustrative example

    With the evidence package, a digital government agency documents its compliance with the data law with the system’s record, and not with a report written by hand.

  5. How much work does supervision take?

    • Today

      Every act is recorded and signed when it happens: who acted, under whose authorization, and when.

    • 2027 service · 2028 product

      The supervisor verifies the record instead of reading reports.

    Illustrative example

    With the evidence package, a small regulator supervises the agents of three banks with two people, receiving signed records instead of quarterly reports.

Dates are projections of the current development plan, not commitments.